Effective methods of capacity control via uniform convergence bounds for function expansions have been largely limited to Support Vector machines, where good bounds are obtainable by the entropy number approach. We extend these methods to systems with expansions in terms of arbitrary (parametrized) basis functions and a wide range of regularization methods covering the whole range of general linear additive models. This is achieved by a data dependent analysis of the eigenvalues of the corresponding design matrix.

Effective methods of capacity control via uniform convergence bounds for function expansions have been largely limited to Support Vector machines, where good bounds are obtainable by the entropy number approach. We extend these methods to systems with expansions in terms of arbitrary (parametrized) basis functions and a wide range of regularization methods covering the whole range of general linear additive models. This is achieved by a data dependent analysis of the eigenvalues of the corresponding design matrix.

Effective methods of capacity control via uniform convergence bounds for function expansions have been largely limited to Support Vector machines, wheregood bounds are obtainable by the entropy number approach.

In fact, for many of the kernels used (not the polynomial kernels) like Gaussian rbf-kernels it can be shown [6] that SV machines are universal approximators. While this is advantageous in general, parametric models are useful techniques in their own right. Especially if one happens to have additional knowledge about the problem, it would be unwise not to take advantage of it. For instance it might be the case that the major properties of the data are described by a combination of a small set of linear independent basis functions {¢Jt (.),..., ¢n (.)}. Or one may want to correct the data for some (e.g.

The kernel-parameter is one of the few tunable parameters in Support Vector machines, controlling the complexity of the resulting hypothesis. Its choice amounts to model selection and its value is usually found by means of a validation set. We present an algorithm which can automatically perform model selection with little additional computational cost and with no need of a validation set. In this procedure model selection and learning are not separate, but kernels are dynamically adjusted during the learning process to find the kernel parameter which provides the best possible upper bound on the generalisation error. Theoretical results motivating the approach and experimental results confirming its validity are presented.

In fact, for many of the kernels used (not the polynomial kernels) like Gaussian rbf-kernels it can be shown [6] that SV machines are universal approximators. While this is advantageous in general, parametric models are useful techniques in their own right. Especially if one happens to have additional knowledge about the problem, it would be unwise not to take advantage of it. For instance it might be the case that the major properties of the data are described by a combination of a small set of linear independent basis functions {¢Jt (.),..., ¢n (.)}. Or one may want to correct the data for some (e.g.

The kernel-parameter is one of the few tunable parameters in Support Vector machines, controlling the complexity of the resulting hypothesis. Its choice amounts to model selection and its value is usually found by means of a validation set. We present an algorithm which can automatically perform model selection with little additional computational cost and with no need of a validation set. In this procedure model selection and learning are not separate, but kernels are dynamically adjusted during the learning process to find the kernel parameter which provides the best possible upper bound on the generalisation error. Theoretical results motivating the approach and experimental results confirming its validity are presented.

In fact, for many of the kernels used (not the polynomial kernels) like Gaussian rbf-kernels it can be shown [6] that SV machines are universal approximators. While this is advantageous in general, parametric models are useful techniques in their own right. Especially if one happens to have additional knowledge about the problem, it would be unwise not to take advantage of it. For instance it might be the case that the major properties of the data are described by a combination of a small set of linear independent basis functions {¢Jt (.), ..., ¢n (.)}. Or one may want to correct the data for some (e.g.

The kernel-parameter is one of the few tunable parameters in Support Vectormachines, controlling the complexity of the resulting hypothesis. Its choice amounts to model selection and its value is usually found by means of a validation set. We present an algorithm whichcan automatically perform model selection with little additional computational cost and with no need of a validation set. In this procedure model selection and learning are not separate, but kernels are dynamically adjusted during the learning process to find the kernel parameter which provides the best possible upper bound on the generalisation error. Theoretical results motivating the approach and experimental results confirming its validity are presented.

We explore methods for incorporating prior knowledge about a problem at hand in Support Vector learning machines. We show that both invariances under group transfonnations and prior knowledge about locality in images can be incorporated by constructing appropriate kernel functions.